Fwd: Neo-Con: 'Execute Rosie For Questioning the Government'

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/300307executerosie.htm

Neo-Con: 'Execute Rosie For Questioning the Government'
Feverish MSNBC guest calls for death penalty to stop free speech
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, March 30, 2007

digg_url
= 'http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/300307executerosie.h
tm'; digg_title = 'Neo-Con: Execute Rosie For Questioning the
Government'; digg_bodytext = 'Frothing bloodthirsty Neo-Con TV
talking heads have crossed the line in their response to Rosie O
Donnell's comments on The View, with one MSNBC guest calling for O
Donnell to be executed for questioning the U.S. government.';
digg_topic = 'politics';

Frothing bloodthirsty Neo-Con TV
talking heads have crossed the line in their response to Rosie
O'Donnell's comments on The View, with one MSNBC guest calling for
O'Donnell to be executed for questioning the U.S. government.
Maniacal Neo-Con attack dogs cannot debate Rosie O'Donnell on a
level playing field about the issues she raises on her show and
therefore always have to resort to ad hominem name calling, demands
that she be fired and as was broadcast last night, public calls for
her to be hanged.
Actor and radio host Danny Bonaduce, appearing as a guest last
night on MSNBC's Scarborough Country, hosted by former Republican
Congressman Joe Scarborough, advocated the death penalty in response
to Rosie O'Donnell's statements about the Iran hostage crisis and her
questioning the official story behind 9/11.

"Personally I think at this point if anyone had a rope thick
enough, I think that Rosie should be strung up for treason," states
Bonaduce, claiming that O'Donnell is giving "aid and comfort to the
enemy."
Bonaduce was quick to cry foul after claiming his own family had
received death threats after he appeared in a You Tube video being
asked about 9/11 conspiracies, but it seems he has no qualms about
advocating the murder of Rosie O'Donnell.
Unlike Bonaduce and his ilk, we afford him the right to make his
sick and disgraceful comments under the banner of the first
amendment, but the nature of his warped rhetoric highlights perfectly
the attitude of these festering Bush cheerleaders and their
fundamentalist zeal to see anyone who questions the government hung
from the highest rafter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv. Thousands
of special reports, videos, MP3's, interviews, conferences, speeches,
events, documentary films, books and more - all for just 15 cents a
day! Click here to subscribe! Find out the true story behind
government sponsored terror, 7/7, Gladio and 9/11, get Terror Storm!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Because Bonaduce doesn't have the intellectual capacity nor the
decorum to calmly refute Rosie with reasoning, logic and evidence,
his only recourse is to impetuously demand she be killed.
Likewise, the Hannity's, Scarborough's and O'Reilly's of the world
can only keep feeding their braindead audience the kool-aid by
wrapping themselves in phony patriotism and calling O'Donnell un-
American because she doesn't agree that U.S. troops should be fed
into another meat grinder.

Death penalty for Rosie?
These mouthpieces have the nerve to demand O'Donnell apologize to
troops in Iraq when it was their willful and unquestioning pimping of
war propaganda fed to them by the Bush administration that helped get
the troops into the disaster in the first place.
The remainder of their rebuttal consists of highlighting
O'Donnell's weight, while repeating a string of childish insults to
the glowing approval of their mindless desecrated American flag made
in China waving drunken audience.
The other aspect to it is that they are panicking about their
ratings dropping month after month and know that starting a feud with
O'Donnell will temporarily bring back attention to their failing
broadcast and briefly rejuvenate their stuttering careers.
Any rational minded person can look at what both sides are saying
and come to a decision as to who is more likely telling the truth -
an individual who presents evidence and asks questions in a detailed
and calm manner, or a gaggle of attack dogs who hurl 3rd grade level
insults and demand the individual be killed for questioning the
status quo.
You decide.