Thursday, March 22, 2007

Dr. Wood and others challenge NIST Report



March 22, 2007

CONTACT: Dr. Judy Wood or Attorney Jerry Leaphart 203-825-6265

For Immediate Release:
Basic Facts:

A Request for Correction (RFC) submitted under the Data Quality Act
(DQA) was filed with National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) on March 16, 2007

NIST acknowledged receipt of RFC in writing on March 19, 2007, via
its Acting Chief of Management and Organization Division, Stephen

RFC challenges the integrity of NIST document NCSTAR 1 (National
Construction Safety Team Advisory Committee), Report on the Collapse
of the World Trade Center Towers, issued in September 2005


A full copy of the RFC filed by DR. Wood can be viewed at

Dr. Judy Wood (with degrees in Civil Engineering, Engineering
Mechanics, and Materials Engineering Science), widely acknowledged as
the leading proponent of the theory that Directed Energy Weapons
(DEW) were used to destroy the World Trade Center (WTC) complex, has
filed a Request for Correction under the Data Quality Act with the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), located in
Gaithersburg, MD.

Dr. Wood is represented in this effort by Attorney Jerry Leaphart, a
Connecticut-based trial lawyer, who states that NIST now has 60 days
to respond to the RFC. After that, an appeal can be taken and/or
other legal action may then follow.

Leaphart further states that Dr. Wood knows that the implications of
her theory that DEW were used to destroy the WTC complex shatter
certain key beliefs that Americans as a whole cherish and hold dear.
Her theory has generated a lot of interest and commentary within the
9/11 Truth Movement that relies primarily upon the Internet as its
media source. Mainstream print and broadcast media do not cover the
9/11 Truth Movement, but may need to take heed of this administrative
action filed by Dr. Wood, according to Attorney Leaphart.

Leaphart said that to his knowledge, only three RFCs concerning
NIST's WTC report have been filed to date. One by Dr. Morgan
Reynolds, another by Edward F. Haas and the one filed by Dr. Wood.
All three are currently pending.

The 43 page RFC filed by Wood asserts that the basic integrity of
NCSTAR 1 is lacking because, by its own admission, it did not
investigate the actual destruction of the World Trade Center Towers.

NCSTAR 1 admits:

"The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from
the instance of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for
each tower. For brevity in this report, this sequence is referred to
as the "probable collapse sequence," although it does not actually
include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for
collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable."
[See NCSTAR 1, pgs xxxvii, footnote 2 and/or 82, footnote 13]

E.1 Genesis of this investigation

p. xxxv-xxxvi (pp. 37-38): "The specific objectives were:

1. Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed following the
initial impacts of the aircraft and why and how WTC 7 collapsed; ..."

E.2 Approach

p. xxxvii (p. 39) footnote2 "The focus of the Investigation was on
the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the
initiation of collapse for each tower. For brevity in this report,
this sequence is referred to as the probable collapse sequence,"
although it includes little analysis of the structural behavior of
the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached
and collapse became inevitable.

Thus, to this day, Americans have not been given any explanation
whatsoever for the destruction of the WTC complex that comports with
information and quality standards.

In contrast, Dr. Wood's RFC contains a stunning array of visual
evidence confirming highly unusual energy effects seen by all as the
twin towers were almost instantaneously destroyed in less time than
it would take a billiard ball to hit the ground if dropped from the
height of the twin towers.

That fact is assessed on the basis of the two other laws of physics
in Wood's RFC, thus confirming its scientific rigor. Wood also points
to other compelling evidence that NIST ignored. Wood's RFC shows
visual evidence of unusual and unexplained blast effects on vehicles
parked blocks away from the complex. Wood also demonstrates
unexplained visual damage in the form of perpendicular gouges in WTC
3, and WTC 4,5,6 and the near disappearance of WTC 3, all of which
remain unexplained by NIST to this day. Wood goes further and points
out that the incredible amount of dust resulting from the visible
process of steel disintegrating before our very eyes all point to the
use of directed energy weapons. One other element of Wood's proof is
the almost complete lack of even a rubble pile at the WTC complex.
Wood asks: Where did it go?

Added to all of that is the fact that whatever the energy and heat
source was, it had no effect upon paper that was seen floating
everywhere and not burning very much, if at all.

Dr. Wood's RFC demonstrates all of the above mentioned effects in its
43 pages of text and pictorial proof. The combined effects of
gravity, jet fuel (a form of kerosene) and plane damage could not
possibly have caused the massive destruction that occurred on
September 11, 2001, in New York City, according to Dr. Wood. The
wonder of it all is that more engineers and scientists have not come
forward to challenge the woeful, scientific inadequacies of the
official explanation.

Dr. Wood invites her peers and colleagues to set aside their
emotional attachments and to view the evidence objectively. Then and
only then can America come to grips with what happened on 9/11/01,
according to Dr. Wood.

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home