Saturday, December 23, 2006

Olmert's Connection to 9/11

Christopher Bollyn is one of the few independent journalists and researchers who uncovers new information and adds to the evidence of false flag terror, instead of just continuously rehashing news and other people's work.
I would like to bring to attention his two newest works building on his research of evidence of Israeli involvement in the 911 attacks:
The Likud Criminal Gang Behind 9/11 and the War on Terror and The Israeli Prime Minister's Connection to 9/11
In these articles you'll get a biography of Olmert, his Jabotinsky ideological roots, his corruption, and some anecdotes about his recent tours in Europe. Significantly, you'll also read about his connections to the security firms responsible for security in the airports the 911 hijacked planes flew from:
"The Likud fundraising scandal culminated in the March 1996 conviction of three Likudniks, including Menahem Atzmon, Olmert's co-treasurer. As the party treasurer, Olmert was indicted in the Likud crimes but received special treatment and was acquitted.
During the 1970s Olmert had worked in the law firm owned by another Atzmon, Uzi Atzmon.
Menahem J. Atzmon, Olmert's co-defendant and ally, was convicted in Israel but went on to become the founder and head of International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS). This Israeli-run company is the owner of Huntleigh USA, the airport security firm that ran passenger screening operations at the airports of Boston and Newark on 9/11.
Huntleigh USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of ICTS, a Netherlands-based aviation and transportation security firm headed by “former [Israeli] military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies.”
Atzmon, convicted in Israel in 1996 for crimes committed with Likud party fund raising schemes, and his business partner Ezra Harel, took over passenger screening and security at the Boston and Newark airports when ICTS acquired Huntleigh USA in 1999.
United Flight 175 and American Flight 11, which allegedly struck the twin towers, both originated from Boston's Logan Airport, while United Flight 93, which purportedly crashed in Pennsylvania, departed from the Newark airport. Atzmon, a convicted Israeli criminal, is the CEO who also controls and operates the German port of Rostock on the Baltic Sea. The bus that blew up at Tavistock exploded outside the London office of ICTS.
Some 9/11 victims’ families brought lawsuits against Huntleigh USA claiming the security firm had been grossly negligent on 9-11. While these relatives have the right to know what the Israeli security company did or did not do to protect their loved ones on 9-11, Huntleigh, along with two other foreign security companies, was granted congressional protection in 2002 and will not be called to account for its actions in any U.S. court.
Atzmon, a convicted criminal, political ally and co-defendant of Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, was directly responsible for passenger and airline security at Boston's Logan Airport, whence the two airliners which struck the World Trade Center originated. His airport security firm is a prime suspect in the false flag terror attacks of 9/11.
Olmert's relationship with Atzmon and his responsibility for Boston's airport security on 9/11 is a conspicuous tip – completely ignored by the controlled press – of the Israeli and Zionist criminal network involved in the terror attacks that started the so-called "War on Terror." "
These airport security firms are protected from examination when they allowed alleged terrorist hijackers to pass through them. Why? Shouldn't they be investigated to see how and what went wrong? Also, they never produced any CCTV video evidence showing any of the 'hijackers' getting on the planes. Why are they being protected? Shouldn't they at least have been approached to see where they went wrong to improve security? This is only one item connecting Zionist elites to 911. It may be a coincidence, but given all the other connections, there's a strong case to follow on these leads and see just how much deeper these connections go.
Posted in Submitted by MonkeyZerg on Sat, 2006-12-23 21:55.MonkeyZerg's blog login or register to post comments

European 9/11Citizens Jury

European 9/11Citizens Jury
Objectives & Plans • Organisational StructureDonate Contact List of Senior Military, Intelligence & Government Critics of the Official 9/11 Commission ReportPhoto evidence proving prior planning of eventsOriginal WTC building plans & photosThe Hidden Background
"You assist an evil system most effectively by obeying its orders and decrees. An evil system never deserves such allegiance. Allegiance to it means partaking of the evil. A good person will resist an evil system with his or her whole soul." Mahatma Gandhi
Learn More

Former CIA Official Exposes Bush Administration Fraud (Video)

Flynt Leverett: More Fraud by Bush

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Strategies and Solutions Conference | February 23-25, 2007

Crowne Plaza San Marcos Chandler, Arizona
The information is overwhelming.Accountability must be demanded!Join us for the 9/11 Accountability Conferencefocusing on Strategies and Solutions to hold those responsible . . .Accountable!Key Note Speakers • Entertainment• Panel Discussions • Strategy Workshops • Documentary Film Marathon • Networking
Learn More

Boston Air Traffic Controller Says 9/11 An Inside Job

Boston Air Traffic Controller Says 9/11 An Inside Job
United StatesBoston Air Traffic Controller Says 9/11 An Inside JobBy Joseph WatsonDec 19, 2006, 17:03
Knew people in FAA on day of hijackings who said intercept procedures should have been enacted as normal
A former Boston Center air traffic controller has gone public on his assertion that 9/11 was an inside job and that Donald Rumsfeld and the Pentagon tracked three of the four flights from the point of their hijacking to hitting their targets. In an astounding telephone interview, Robin Hordon claims air traffic controllers have been ignored or silenced to protect the true perpetrators of 9/11.
A recording of the phone conversation was posted on Google video late yesterday by the Pilots For 9/11 Truth organization.
After having acquired a background in aviation, Hordon underwent rigorous FAA training to become an air traffic controller and was posted to Boston Center where he worked for eleven years. He did not work at Boston Center when 9/11 occurred but still knows people that did who concur with his conclusions. In comparing the stand down of air defense on 9/11 and what should have occurred according to standard operating procedure, he quickly concluded on the very afternoon of the attacks that they could represent nothing other than an inside job.
"On September 11th I'm one of the few people who really within quite a few hours of the whole event taking place just simply knew that it was an inside job, and it wasn't because of the visuals, the collapses, whatever....I knew that it was an inside job I think within about four or five o'clock that afternoon and the reason that I knew is because when those aircraft did collide and then we got the news and information on where the aircraft were and where they went....if they knew where the aircraft were and were talking to them at a certain time then normal protocol is to get fighter jet aircraft up assist," said Hordon.
Hordon said that from personal experience he knew the system was always ready to immediately scramble intercepting fighters and that any reversal of that procedure would have been unprecedented and abnormal. He had also personally handled both real hijacking situations in his airspace and other emergency procedures.
"I know people who work there who confirmed to me that the FAA was not asleep and the controllers could do the job, they followed their own protocols," he stated.
Hordon said that the only way the airliners could have avoided being intercepted was if a massive electrical and communications failure had occurred which it didn't on that day, adding that there was "no way" the hijacked airliners could have reached their targets otherwise.
He highlighted the fact that only an emergency handling of aircraft protocol change on that day could have interrupted standard operating procedure and hijacking protocol. Hordon said it was unbelievable how far American Airlines Flight 11 was allowed to go off course without the appropriate action being taken on behalf of flight controllers.
"What you do is you don't wait for the judge, jury and executioner to prove it's an emergency, if things start to go wrong you have the authority to simply say I am going to treat this craft as if it is an emergency, because if everybody's wrong then fifteen minutes later no big thing."
Hordon emphasized that the debate has deliberately been channeled by NORAD and the government to focus on reactions to hijackings, when the real issue is the emergency condition of the aircraft well before a hijacking is even confirmed.
He went on to explain how as soon as the hijacking of Flight 11 was confirmed at around 8:24am, the entire system, from every FAA center coast to coast, to the Pentagon, to the President were informed and knew of the hijacking.
"The system now had to make some phone calls and call up Rummy's Pentagon and Rummy's Pentagon is the one that would then make the decision."
"Well, Rummy's Pentagon on American 11 didn't answer the phone, neither 175, didn't answer the phone and they didn't answer the phone until they were absolutely embarrassed into answering the phone somewhere along the flight of United 93 and American 77 - first formal contact was at this particular time," said Hordon.
"That is all distractionary, that is all designed to keep people off the focus - the real focus is what the air traffic controller did immediately upon seeing that American 11 was in trouble and what we do as air traffic controllers is we get eyes and ears on this flight."
Hordon underscored the fact that after the confirmed hijacking of Flight 11, the entire FAA system would have been on full alert and obsessively watching the skies for any unusual activity, and that such activity as the hijacking of Flight 77 would have been immediately reported to supervisors instantaneously, as well as being continually tracked.
"If the air traffic controller were going by emergency procedures which he is trained to do, he would have reached out directly to ADC (NORAD) and say what do you see?" said Hordon.
This highlights the absurdity of Dulles controllers mistaking Flight 77 for a fighter jet as it approached Washington as was reported, and the plane's over 40 minute uninterrupted journey to the Pentagon after a hijack was confirmed.
Hordon debunked the recent Vanity Fair piece that whitewashed NORAD's response as a consequence of confusion and the supposition that NORAD needs exact flight coordinates to enact any kind of response, and that the planes were supposedly invisible to radar and couldn't be tracked properly.
"It's very clear now through testimony and documents given to us by the federal government that indeed....the Boston Center actually tracked American 11 as a primary target after it lost its radar, after it lost its transponder, all the way to World Trade Center," he said.
"Further information indicates later the NORAD radars had it tracked....the bottom line of the story is that all of those aircraft were always tracked all the time by the FAA air traffic control centers," said Hordon, pointing out that information showing air traffic controllers tried insistently to alert military command structures is being locked down because it points to finger of responsibility to Donald Rumsfeld and the Pentagon, who were also tracking all the aircraft from the point of hijacking to the impact on their targets.
This is the reason why, as Hordon stated, that we don't have complete access to flight data recorders and FAA tapes, which in the case of a conversation between six New York Air Route Traffic Control Center controllers was ordered to be shredded,
because if studies of that evidence were undertaken it would become very clear as to who was really behind the attack.
"What they did is they cherry picked transmissions, communications and statements made all on these four flights that were able to paint and write a story that the public would look at and so ooh wow, this really happened - but it wasn't factual, it was a story and it tell not tell anything other than what the high perps wanted the public to hear - they cherry picked this information," said Hordon.
Hordon ended by saying that only with the testimony from the dozens of flight controllers who have been silenced or ignored would the true story about who carried out 9/11 begin to emerge.

Morgan Stanley charged with using '9/11 smokescreen' to hide e-mails

In a disciplinary complaint, the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) alleges that Morgan Stanley used a "9/11 smokescreen" to hide e-mails sought by angry claimants in numerous arbitration proceedings from October 2001 through March 2005.
The securities industry's self-regulating arm accuses Morgan Stanley of "falsely claiming that millions of emails it possessed had been lost in the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York, where its email servers were housed."
"In fact, according to the complaint, Morgan Stanley possessed millions of pre-September 11 emails that had been restored to its system shortly after September 11 using back-up tapes," stated an NASD press release obtained by RAW STORY. "Many other emails were maintained on individual users’ computers and were therefore never affected by the attacks, yet Morgan Stanley often failed to search those computers when responding to requests."
Read More

Bush Illegally Silences Critic of Iran Policy (Video)

Flynt Leveret

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

North American Union - The NAFTA Super Highway - Amero

We the people of the USA are being overthrown by Trade Treaties.

U.S. seeks to rein in its military spy teams Special Forces units work in allied countries and clash with the CIA.

12/18/06 " Los Angeles Times" -- - WASHINGTON — U.S. Special Forces teams sent overseas on secret spying missions have clashed with the CIA and carried out operations in countries that are staunch U.S. allies, prompting a new effort by the agency and the Pentagon to tighten the rules for military units engaged in espionage, according to senior U.S. intelligence and military officials.
Read More

Ohio Political Prisoner Sentenced To 8 Year Prison Term

Elsebeth Baumgartner was expecting probation but judge backed-out of plea bargain. Former Ohio attorney still sits in an Ohio jail, hoping to be released on bond for Christmas.19 Dec 2006
By Greg Szymanski

The Ohio attorney who has fought corruption tooth and nail has finally had the wicked hand of fascism turn the jailhouse key, locking her away for a long and unwarranted prison term.

Elsebeth Baumgartner was sentenced Monday by Cuyahoga Country Judge, Shirley Saffold, to 8 years in prison on felony charges of intimidation and retaliation, charges Baumgartner said were “trumped up and bogus.”

Although Baumgartner was facing more than 109 years in jail and had already served more than 250 days behind bars, the sentence was dished out according to a last minute plea bargain which was supposed to be for probation, not jail time.

“The judge didn’t live up to the deal handed to Else by prosecutors, but she was given a $50,000 bond to stay out of jail pending appeal,” said her husband, Joe Baumgartner, Monday from his Ohio home. “The only problem is she is now serving 120 days on a misdemeanor contempt charges and she is having trouble being released on those charges.

“We are also looking for a way to overturn the sentencing since it wasn’t hat Else agreed to under the arrangements of the plea bargain. It appears again that the powers that be just flaunt justice and do whatever they want while Else is literally being persecuted.”

Baumgartner’s unique case has sent shockwaves through the patriot community as her many radio appearances illustrate how she has become one of America’s No. 1 political prisoners, showing just how far down the road of fascism this country has gone.

But in the mainstream press her story remains a virtual secret, unreported and hidden, showing how the press has become nothing but a propaganda arm for a fascist government hiding the red, white and blue American flag.

What makes Baumgartner’s case so outrageous is that all her troubles began over trying to do the right thing by uncovering corruption in her home state of Ohio which led all the way to the doorstep of the White House.
Read More

Cheney to be witness in Libby CIA leak trial

WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney will be called as a defense witness in the CIA leak case, of his former chief of staff, I Lewis "Scooter Libby, Libby's attorney told a federal judge today.
"We're calling the vice president," attorney Ted Wells said in a court hearing. After the hearing another attorney for Libby, William Jeffress said he does not expect the Vice President to resist testifying at the trial scheduled to begin in January. Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, responded by saying, "That settles that." Fitzgerald had said that he did not expect to call Cheney as a witness.
"We don't expect him to resist," Jeffress said of Cheney's proposed testimony.
Fitzgerald said earlier this week that he did not expect the White House to resist if Cheney or other administration officials are called to testify.
The Vice President himself has said in a CNN interview in June, "I may be called as a witness."
Read More


Thanks to Josh from for putting this great video together of the event.

Pics from the SF 9/11 Truth Tea Party

9/11 Truth is alive all over the USA

Monday, December 18, 2006

Milwaukee "9/11 Truth Boston Tea Party" (Video)

Milwaukee "Boston Tea Party"

What a Legal Case Against the 911 Criminals Would Sound Like (Video)

CBS TV News coverage of the SF Tea Party for 9/11 Truth (Video)

CBS TV News coverage of the SF Tea Party for 9/11 Truth

Sunday, December 17, 2006

Boston Tea Party for 9/11Truth (Video)

Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth

U.S. lawmakers press for info on 5-year-old anthrax scare

A cadre of U.S. lawmakers fired off a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales pleading for new information on the five-years-and-running investigation into the 2001 anthrax scare that shocked South Dakota when then-Sen. Tom Daschle's office was caught up in the attacks.The bipartisan letter, signed by 33 members of Congress this week, extends an effort by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J., to persuade the FBI to release an update on the case."In one of the most important terrorism investigations ever undertaken by the FBI, it is unbelievable to me that members of Congress, some who were targets of the anthrax attacks, haven't been briefed for years," Grassley said.
The FBI, citing concern about information in the unsolved case being leaked to the public, has refused lawmakers' requests.Grassley and the other lawmakers said in the letter that leaked information is a valid concern, but they maintained it does not justify keeping lawmakers in the dark. They said they need the information to perform their required oversight of the FBI's performance.
Congress "cannot be cut-off from detailed information about the conduct of one of the largest investigations in FBI history," the lawmakers wrote to Gonzales. "That information is vital in order to fulfill its Constitutional responsibility to conduct oversight of the Executive Branch."
Read More


Patrick Leahy. For those who've heard Senator Leahy speak, you know that his delivery can vary quite a bit. It can be easy to tell when he's tired, physically or mentally - so Leahy on the stump doesn't necessarily mean the same thing twice. But Leahy of late has had a fire in his belly, the likes of which we haven't seen in a while. His sadness at the loss of comity and the discarding of basic Constitutional values under the Bush GOP has turned into outrage, and he has been consistently riveting in front of a crowd in recent months.But since the election, that outrage has turned into inspiration, and it's an inspiration he passed on to the crowd tonight. Like the speakers before him, Leahy was funny, thankful, exuberant... but there was an edge that was very serious. He related a conversation where he was recently asked if President Bush should be "worried" that he was now to be Chair of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee. The crowd started cheering."No, no" he said, calming the crowd, as if to be prepared for a softening of his rhetoric.
"No, he shouldn't be worried. He should be terrified.
"And the room exploded.
Learn More