Saturday, March 31, 2007

Fwd: "Blackwater: The Rise Of The World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army"

Must see this:
On Saturday, March 31 at 9:00 pm and Sunday, April 1 at 6:00 pm and at
9:00 pm
After Words: Jeremy Scahill, author of "Blackwater: The Rise Of The
World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army" interviewed by David Martin

Bush calls capture of U.K. sailors 'inexcusable'

News Updates from Citizens for Legitimate Government
31 March 2007
Breaking: Bush calls capture of U.K. sailors 'inexcusable' --Ahmadinejad rips U.K. for not following 'legal, logical way' to resolve issue 31 Mar 2007 President [sic] Bush said Saturday that Iran's detention of 15 British sailors was "inexcusable" and that Tehran must release them immediately. [It's time for the US to release the five Iranians seized by American forces in Iraq. Bush's illegal occupation of the White House *and* Iraq is inexcusable, too. --LRP]

Bush Calls for Iran to Free U.K. Sailors 31 Mar 2007 President [sic] Bush on Saturday called for the release of 15 British sailors and marines being held by Iran, calling their capture by Tehran "inexcusable behavior." "Iran must give back the hostages,'' Bush said. "They're innocent, they did nothing wrong, and they were summarily plucked out of waters." [See: Fake Maritime Boundaries By Ambassador Craig Murray 28 Mar 2007 The British Government has published a map showing the coordinates of the incident, well within an Iran/Iraq maritime border... A) The Iran/Iraq maritime boundary shown on the British government map does not exist. It has been drawn up by the British Government. Only Iraq and Iran can agree to their bilateral boundary, and they never have done this in the Gulf, only inside the Shatt because there it is the land border too. This published boundary is a fake with no legal force. B) Accepting the British coordinates for the position of both HMS Cornwall and the incident, both were closer to Iranian land than Iraqi land.]

Fwd: Gate Keepers: Foundations Fund Phony Left Media

Click on picture to expand.

Fwd: Re: [v911t] "Hard Evidence" - Professor Steven Jones responds to Tritium levels in TU rather

"Hard Evidence" - Professor Steven Jones responds to Tritium levels in TU rather than nCi/L

Another action to save Rosie's position @ ABC

Write ABC @ The View>>>

Urgent Action Alert>They're trying to fire Rosie O'Donnel

Bill O'Reilly has promised the world that Rosie has had her last day
on "The View"...She's on vacation until a week from next Tuesday she
told us at her blog...If she's not back after that it will mean the
enemy has succeded in silencing America and we are doomed...We can't
allow that...Please forward this everywhere...This is an AOL poll so we
can only hope it's not fixed

Contact ABC in support of Rosie

Contact ABC in support of Rosie

You know that you're doing something right if Bill O'Reilly makes you
the subject of his evening's hate fest. In a courageous attempt to
bring to the public some of the glaring questions about 9/11, Rosie
O'Donnell dared to question the official narrative on ABC's The View.
In addition to going public with her skepticism of 9/11, Rosie
recently wrote a blog entry encouraging her readers to research 9/11,
in particular the building 7 demolition. Apparently questioning the
official story was too much for Bill O'Reilly, who, never straying
from his usual bullying tactics, predictably called for the network
to fire Rosie, claiming she was irresponsible and disrespecting the
people who died that fateful day.
If you are in support of Rosie O'Donnell's comments please call ABC
immediately to tell them and please pass this information along to
others. Comments can be submitted via phone by dialing (818) 460-7477
then press #2 - then press #4 (for Daytime shows) then press #849
(for The View)

email contact:

Ex-Partner Of Giuliani May Face Charges

Ex-Partner Of Giuliani May Face ChargesKerik Counts Said To Include
Deception During Cabinet Bid By John Solomon and Matthew Mosk
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 31, 2007; Page A01
Federal prosecutors have told Bernard B. Kerik, whose nomination as
homeland security secretary in 2004 ended in scandal, that he is
likely to be charged with several felonies, including tax evasion and
conspiracy to commit wiretapping.
Kerik's indictment could set the stage for a courtroom battle that
would draw attention to Kerik's extensive business and political
dealings with former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, who
personally recommended him to President Bush for the Cabinet.
Giuliani, the front-runner for the 2008 Republican presidential
nomination according to most polls, later called the recommendation a

9/11 Citizens Grand Jury-- witness/pilot wrote: Bob,

On Saturday, April 14th , we are having a Citizen Grand Jury event here in San Diego. Our "San Diegans for 911 Truth" group( ) is sponsoring the event with Mike Copass (one of our members) as the coordinator. Please check our web site for the details.

Among the many "expert' witnesses that will be present, I have been asked to testify on 1) the probability that the four commercial aircrafts were actually hijacked by 19 inexperienced and unqualified pilots
2) the probability of these inexperienced and unqualified pilots being able to fly/navigate commercial aircraft into the WTC towers in New York City.

Since we have so many qualified pilots in our "pilots for 9/11 truth" organization, would you pass on this information to our membership and see if there would be someone in the San Diego area ( or someone that would like to visit the San Diego area) that would like to participate as an "expert witness" on April 14th in our Citizens Grand Jury.

Having retired from Pan American in 1991, I am looking for someone with more current experience as a commercial pilot. Hope to hear from you soon.

Ted Muga
Naval aviator(USNR) -Cdr.-retired
Commercial pilot - Pan American Airlines-retired
BS-Civil Engineering - Southern Methodist University
(619) 222-2120 /

Note the following Press Release concerning the CGJ event:
Press Release

(For Immediate Release) 3/07/07 San Diego, California
Local Activists and Citizens to Formally Investigate
Crimes Relating to the Events of September 11, 2001

Grand Jury to be held at San Diego State University, April 14-15, 2007
Qualified Grand Jurors Sought

A A citizens activism group, San Diegans for 9/11 Truth, is pleased to announce that they wiwill hold a Citizens Grand Jury investigation into 9/11 events and crimes. The group will brbring together citizens to hear testimony from 9/11 researchers, authors and experts, including renowned authors Don Paul and Jim Hoffman, who wrote "9/11 Waking Up FrFrom Our Nightmare."
A A common-law grand jury of 23 citizens will be impaneled to review evidence at this pPublic event, to be held April 14, 2007 at San Diego State University. I aI am writing to you because you submitted your address at one of the related 9/11 eevents. We want the grand jury to represent a cross-section of our society and we ststrongly encourage you to submit an application. Please see attachment.

We seek applicants who are courageous, patient, have strong analytical and critical abilities, good writing abilities. We would like to have firemen and doctors, teachers and artists, businesspeople, individuals with legal experience, mothers and retired persons, rabbis and poets; in short, any citizen who wishes to commit his or her time to this important inquiry. For more information see Download the 'Citizen's Grand Jury Application' (Microsoft Word document) Thank you,
Michael Copass
Coordinator San Diego Citizens’ Grand Jury

What is wrong with Rosie O'Donnell?

What is wrong with Rosie O'Donnell? Who does she think she is? I think she is a patriot, and that she sees the outcome of not taking action as worse than speaking out. 9/11 was done by people inside and outside of the US government, there is no doubt about that, it is not a theory, it is a fact. Millions of people know that now, many knew it that since day one. They did it, we know it, now what do we do? 9/11 was a coup that gave the PNAC people a green light to go ahead with wars. To go ahead with a repeal of the Constitution, replace it with a Patriot Act, torture, illegal wire taps, and nazi germany comes to mind as an apt parallel to what has ensued since 9/11. So Rosie is like the rest of us that know, and see what is going on here, and unlike most of her peers she is telling people, 30 million people all at once. She knew she would get heat over it, she did it anyways. If more Americans were like Rosie, calling a spade a spade, the USA might actually be the land of the free, and the home of the brave.

Veterans for 9/11 Truth

Popular Mechanics Debunked

Friday, March 30, 2007

[Fwd: Calum Douglas FDR Presentation in Ipswich]

Excellent presentation given by core member Calum Douglas regarding AA77 FDR.

Now up on front page. Definitely one to watch when you have some time.

Hope everyone is doing well.


Fwd: Neo-Con: 'Execute Rosie For Questioning the Government'

Neo-Con: 'Execute Rosie For Questioning the Government'
Feverish MSNBC guest calls for death penalty to stop free speech
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, March 30, 2007

= '
tm'; digg_title = 'Neo-Con: Execute Rosie For Questioning the
Government'; digg_bodytext = 'Frothing bloodthirsty Neo-Con TV
talking heads have crossed the line in their response to Rosie O
Donnell's comments on The View, with one MSNBC guest calling for O
Donnell to be executed for questioning the U.S. government.';
digg_topic = 'politics';

Frothing bloodthirsty Neo-Con TV
talking heads have crossed the line in their response to Rosie
O'Donnell's comments on The View, with one MSNBC guest calling for
O'Donnell to be executed for questioning the U.S. government.
Maniacal Neo-Con attack dogs cannot debate Rosie O'Donnell on a
level playing field about the issues she raises on her show and
therefore always have to resort to ad hominem name calling, demands
that she be fired and as was broadcast last night, public calls for
her to be hanged.
Actor and radio host Danny Bonaduce, appearing as a guest last
night on MSNBC's Scarborough Country, hosted by former Republican
Congressman Joe Scarborough, advocated the death penalty in response
to Rosie O'Donnell's statements about the Iran hostage crisis and her
questioning the official story behind 9/11.

"Personally I think at this point if anyone had a rope thick
enough, I think that Rosie should be strung up for treason," states
Bonaduce, claiming that O'Donnell is giving "aid and comfort to the
Bonaduce was quick to cry foul after claiming his own family had
received death threats after he appeared in a You Tube video being
asked about 9/11 conspiracies, but it seems he has no qualms about
advocating the murder of Rosie O'Donnell.
Unlike Bonaduce and his ilk, we afford him the right to make his
sick and disgraceful comments under the banner of the first
amendment, but the nature of his warped rhetoric highlights perfectly
the attitude of these festering Bush cheerleaders and their
fundamentalist zeal to see anyone who questions the government hung
from the highest rafter.
The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Thousands
of special reports, videos, MP3's, interviews, conferences, speeches,
events, documentary films, books and more - all for just 15 cents a
day! Click here to subscribe! Find out the true story behind
government sponsored terror, 7/7, Gladio and 9/11, get Terror Storm!
Because Bonaduce doesn't have the intellectual capacity nor the
decorum to calmly refute Rosie with reasoning, logic and evidence,
his only recourse is to impetuously demand she be killed.
Likewise, the Hannity's, Scarborough's and O'Reilly's of the world
can only keep feeding their braindead audience the kool-aid by
wrapping themselves in phony patriotism and calling O'Donnell un-
American because she doesn't agree that U.S. troops should be fed
into another meat grinder.

Death penalty for Rosie?
These mouthpieces have the nerve to demand O'Donnell apologize to
troops in Iraq when it was their willful and unquestioning pimping of
war propaganda fed to them by the Bush administration that helped get
the troops into the disaster in the first place.
The remainder of their rebuttal consists of highlighting
O'Donnell's weight, while repeating a string of childish insults to
the glowing approval of their mindless desecrated American flag made
in China waving drunken audience.
The other aspect to it is that they are panicking about their
ratings dropping month after month and know that starting a feud with
O'Donnell will temporarily bring back attention to their failing
broadcast and briefly rejuvenate their stuttering careers.
Any rational minded person can look at what both sides are saying
and come to a decision as to who is more likely telling the truth -
an individual who presents evidence and asks questions in a detailed
and calm manner, or a gaggle of attack dogs who hurl 3rd grade level
insults and demand the individual be killed for questioning the
status quo.
You decide.

Fwd: 9/11 could pose challenges for Giuliani's '08 run -

9/11 could pose challenges for Giuliani's '08 run - CNN.com_

Fwd: Utterly Fake British Map Of Iran Boundaries

Former British Ambassador Craig Murray is now challenging the
legitimacy of the map just published by the British government in the
current dispute with Iran over those 15 captured British sailors and

"Fake Maritime Boundaries
I have been unpopular before, but the level of threats since I
started blogging on the captured marines has got a bit scary. It is
therefore with some trepidation that I feel obliged to point this

"The British Government has published a map showing the coordinates
of the incident, well within an Iran/Iraq maritime border. The
mainstream media and even the blogosphere has bought this hook, line
and sinker.

"But there are two colossal problems.

"A) The Iran/Iraq maritime boundary shown on the British government
map does not exist. It has been drawn up by the British Government.
Only Iraq and Iran can agree their bilateral boundary, and they never
have done this in the Gulf, only inside the Shatt because there it is
the land border too. This published boundary is a fake with no legal

"B) Accepting the British coordinates for the position of both HMS
Cornwall and the incident, both were closer to Iranian land than
Iraqi land. Go on, print out the map and measure it. Which underlines
the point that the British produced border is not a reliable one.

"None of which changes the fact that the Iranians, having made their
point, should have handed back the captives immediately. I pray they
do so before this thing spirals out of control. But by producing a
fake map of the Iran/Iraq boundary, notably unfavourable to Iran, we
can only harden the Iranian position."

When I spoke with the former Ambassador he told me how dumbfounded he
is by the way in which the mainstream media continues to treat this

The BBC for instance has already interviewed a supposed expert
regarding the map, who vouched for its authenticity. But the point
is, as Craig Murray, points out, how can such a map exist if the
subject of boundaries has never been settled between Iraq and Iran?
Turns out the expert had been referred to the BBC by the British
Ministry of Defense­who also turned out the plan.

Sounds like the rerun of a bad movie we've already seen.

Europe catches the "TRUTH" wave!

Thursday, March 29, 2007


Posted By: Rayelan <Send E-Mail>
Date: Wednesday, 28 March 2007, 8:57 p.m.

Here is a BBC documentary about the bombing of the Murrah
Building that has never been shown in the USA. You will see and hear
things about the bombing at the Murrah Building that most citizens of
the United States have never heard before. The information was sent
to me by a member of V.O.T.I.V.E.S. -
Many of the OKC bombing victim family members belong to the OKC
organization "Victims of Terrorism Information and Vital Exchange
Services", also known as VOTIVES, which has over 194 members. In
August 2005 VOTIVES sent letters to Oklahoma's US Senators James
Inhofe and Tom Colburn. The letters asked the Senators to request
Senate Judiciary Committee hearings and a federal prosecutor for
criminal conduct of FBI and DOJ officials. VOTIVES spokesman Gloria
Chipman also was on an OKC KTOK radio magazine program in August 2005
with host Gwin Lippert describing the reasons for the VOTIVES request
to Inhofe and Coburn.
The VOTIVES letter follows formal requests I made in writing in
early August 2005 to US Senator Inhofe and US Senator Coburn for
Senate Judiciary hearings and prosecutions of certain individual FBI
and DOJ officials relating to the OKC bombing based on FBI and court
documents and news article interviews that I sent to the Senators'
offices and staff in DC. These documents are not based on some
conspiracy theory, they are actual FBI documents obtained by Salt
Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue referred to above that show FBI
and DOJ direct criminal complicity with provocateurs in the murder of
169 people in the OKC bombing and in perjury and criminal obstruction
before OK state and federal grand juries and trials.

Patrick Briley
September 10, 2005 For those who can NOT watch the video due to
dialup problems, I made an audio recording of it. I will post it in
the thread. You can listen to it while you continue "surfing" the
articles on RMN.


Posted By: alchemist <Send E-Mail>
Date: Thursday, 29 March 2007, 9:06 a.m.
"Today" meaning Tuesday, March 27th in San Diego, California. The
original recipient of this message posted it to a Yahoo Group of
which I am a member. After 17 years, Paul Andrew Mitchell has that
entire crowd hogtied and checkmated. The documents speak for
themselves and I urge you to read them.
Message begins:
[What is important to realize, the person who originally sent this
message is a party to the lawsuit itself as you will realize once you
read it all. I have included the official court documents in this
message for those who might not click on the link that also shows the
same thing.]
**My Fellow Americans:
We bring you tidings of great joy.
That was the date and time stamp on our *Sales Receipt* from the
U.S. Postal Service at downtown San Diego, California, USA, at the
very moment we posted this NOTICE OF DEFAULT:
(Tenth Circuit #07-2017) here:

*FINALLY, the federal income tax is officially dead.*
Not only is the U.S. Department of the Treasury legally estopped.
U.S. DOJ attempted to appear on behalf of a Delaware corporation
which has been revoked. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Justice is
also legally estopped from enforcing IRC subtitle A and from
attempting to rebut the AFFIDAVIT above, because the Relator in that
appeal *preempted DOJ* the moment Relator appeared on behalf of the
United States *ex rel:*

It is now the official position of the United States (federal
government) that there is no federal *Statute at Large* which creates
a *specific liability* for income taxes imposed by subtitle A of the
Internal Revenue Code. For standing high Court authority, see
*Commissioner v. Acker*: (see *Am Jur* abstract!)
Moreover, U.S. DOJ cannot now attempt to appear on behalf of the
United States (federal government), because the United States is
already legally represented in that appeal:

Praise God for all of His many blessings during the
past 17 years.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a) (Client
*All Rights Reserved without Prejudice*
Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

*Supreme Law Firm

* wrote:

Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Supreme Law Firm

Subject: legal estoppel is now activated against
U.S. Department of the
To: [redacted]

(Tenth Circuit #07-2017):

See item (7).
This pleading was mailed yesterday (see PROOF OF SERVICE).
A second such NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT was mailed today:

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a) (Client
*All Rights Reserved without Prejudice*
Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General
c/o Forwarding Agent
501 West Broadway #A-332
San Diego 92101

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth website (under construction)


Alex Jones is reporting that Rosie O'Donnell has just come out about
9/11, false flag terror, the dubious nature of the British arrests by
Iran, etc., on The View this morning, purportedly for 9 minutes!

Jones will be posting video on his websites:

If this is true, this is BIG BIG BIG, people! We need to show support
for Rosie (even if you don't like her personally, this was brave for
her to do), and now to understand that she used NATIONAL TELEVISION
get her message across (she's been hinting at it for weeks!).

Let's try to assuage the inevitable vicious attacks that will come
way (ala Charlie Sheen).

Go, Rosie!

Fwd: Operation Bite - April 6 Sneak Attack On Iran By U.S.?

--- In, "Richard Garcia" <rigarcia@...> wrote:

Please post everywhere.

--- End forwarded message ---

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

[Fwd: Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Against Rumsfeld 28 Mar 2007]

Breaking News and Commentary from Citizens for Legitimate Government 28 March 2007
All links to articles as summarized below are available here:
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Against Rumsfeld 27 Mar 2007 Former Defense Secretary [war criminal] Donald H. Rumsfeld cannot be tried on allegations of torture in overseas military prisons, a federal judge said Tuesday in a case he described as "lamentable." U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan threw out a lawsuit brought on behalf of nine former prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan. The lawsuit contends the prisoners were beaten, suspended upside down from the ceiling by chains, urinated on, shocked, sexually humiliated, burned, locked inside boxes and subjected to mock executions. [Hopefully, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rove will end up in the same prisons and subjected to the same treatment--that is, except for the mock executions.]

Release of blueprints to the World Trade Centers

In light of the release of blueprints to the World Trade Centers by a whistleblower to Dr. Steven Jones, Jim Hoffman has updated his essay on the Tower Blueprints. Please read the original article to get the links and diagrams.
Tower BlueprintsSurviving Evidence of the World Trade Center Attack
The blueprints to the Twin Towers and Building 7 remained off-limits to the public for more than five years after the attack, despite the fact that the buildings were built with public money and that the engineering drawings of public buildings are supposed to be public information. 1 Incredibly, the team of engineers from the ASCE that conducted the only investigation of the building "collapses" before Ground Zero had been cleaned up lacked access to the buildings' blueprints -- at least until they signed waivers that they would not use the evidence in a lawsuit against the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. 2Whistleblower Releases Blueprints
In March of 2007, an extensive set of detailed architectural drawings of the World Trade Center became public through the actions of a whistleblower. The 261 drawings included detailed plans for the North Tower (WTC 1), the World Trade Center foundation and basement, and the TV mast atop the North Tower. The set of drawings does not include plans for the other six buildings in the World Trade Center complex. However, since the Twin Towers were of almost identical construction, it is safe to assume that the the structural details that the drawings shown for the North Tower are largely applicable to the South Tower.
The drawings contain a wealth of detail about the buildings, including the dimensions of structural members such as the core columns.
Most of the drawings can be viewed in this multiresolution browser.This 66th floor core plan included in the detailed architectural drawings shows that most of the core columns retained their full outside dimensions well above the midpoints of the Towers. Of the sixteen columns bounding the long faces of the core, thirteen have outside dimensions of approximately 54 by 22 inches in this 66th floor section.Official Reports Misrepresented the Towers' ConstructionPortion of photograph in the collection of the Skyscraper Museum
The detailed architectural drawings make clear what official reports have apparently attempted to hide: that the Twin Towers had massive core columns, and those columns ran most of the height of each Tower before transitioning to columns with smaller cross-sections.
Based on construction photographs exhibited in the Skyscraper Museum and illustrations from the Engineering News Record , 9-11 Research had established by mid-2005 that, low in the Towers, the sixteen core columns that bounded the long faces of the buildings' cores had dimensions of 54 by 22 inches. The detailed drawings show that these columns maintained these dimensions through about the 66th floor.
Both of the government-sponsored engineering studies of the Twin Towers' "collapses" -- FEMA's and NIST's -- are highly misleading about the core structures. Neither Report discloses dimensions for core columns -- dimensions that are clearly evident in the architectural drawings. Both Reports use a variety of techniques seemingly designed to minimize the strength of the cores or to conceal their structural role entirely.
So effective was FEMA at concealing the nature of the cores that the 9/11 Commission Report , citing the FEMA Report, denied the very existence of the core columns.FEMA's Building Performance StudyFigure 2-2 of of FEMA's Building Performance Study, labeled "Representative structural framing plan, upper floors", is one of five illustrations in the report that depict core columns. Each of these illustrations depicts the core columns at their minimum dimensions, and none depict them at their typical dimensions.
In May of 2005, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) released its Building Performance Study, of which Chapter 2, "WTC 1 and WTC 2", was devoted to explaining the "collapse" of the Twin Towers. It advances the "truss theory" or "pancake theory", in which the supposed failure of floor-truss-to-column connections is the initiating event in a series of chain reactions ending in total collapse. Added commentary in our archived copy expose many deceptive techniques employed in the article. 3
Key elements of FEMA's theory depend on misrepresentations of the Towers' construction made possible by their vague descriptions. For example, to explain other collapse of the core their Study states:As the floors collapsed, this left tall freestanding portions of the exterior wall and possibly central core columns. As the unsupported height of these freestanding exterior wall elements increased, they buckled at the bolted column splice connections, and also collapsed.
Contrary to the FEMA's hedged assertion that the core columns were freestanding, construction photographs clearly show that large horizontal beams cross-connected the core columns in a three-dimensional matrix of steel.
FEMA's report seems crafted to hide the structural significance of the core columns, if not their very existence. Examples of features of the Report that minimize or conceal the core structures include:Figure D-13 from FEMA's Study -- the only photograph in the Study that shows a core column
* The absence of any illustrations showing core columns of typical dimensions* The repeated use of the term "service core" to describe the cores, and avoidance of terminology describing their structural role* The use of illustrations that imply the cores didn't exist, such as Figure 2-20* The only photograph of a core column in the Report (Figure D-13) being an atypical column of very small dimensions* The inclusion of only floor plans that show core columns of very small dimensions with no clarification that the core columns that ran most of the Towers' heights were of much larger dimensions
NIST's Final Report on the Twin Towers
In 2005 NIST published its 'Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers' -- a 280-page report that was extremely vague in a number of respects, including any description of the structural systems of the Towers. It contains very little information about the core columns, the following being one of the only passages describing them:Figure 3-3 From NIST's Final Report drastically misrepresents the dimensions of the core columns on the 78th through the 83rd floors.The 47 columns in this rectangular space were fabricated using primarily 36 ksi and 42 ksi steels and also decreased in size in the higher stories. The four massive corner columns bore nearly one-fifth of the total gravity load on the core columns.
The passage implies that only the corner columns were "massive" when, in fact, the sixteen columns on the long faces of the cores shared the same dimensions for most of each Tower's height.
Illustrations in the Report depict the core columns at the North and South Tower crash zones as being the same size, when in fact the core columns were much broader around the 80th floor than around the 95th. NIST's failure to highlight this difference is especially interesting in light of its estimates of core column damage in the Towers. Those esimates show 10 of the South Tower's core columns severed, compared to only 6 of the North Tower's. How could the South Tower's core have had more damage when its impact-level columns were twice as large as the North Tower's and it sustained only a glancing rather than a head-on impact? Was NIST struggling to explain how the South Tower succumbed to "global collapse" almost twice as quickly as the North Tower despite having much smaller fires?World Trade Center Master PlanThis illustration from 'Multi-Storey Buildings in Steel' shows a structural system that matches the drawings in the MASTER PLAN. Multi-Storey Buildings in Steel
Prior to the release of the detailed architectural drawings, 9-11 Research published the MASTER PLAN, dated December 16, 1963. The MASTER PLAN does not show structural details such as column dimensions, and shows an arrangement of core columns that was later changed. The obsolete core column arrangement indicated in the MASTER PLAN has been reproduced in other publications such as the book 'Multi-Storey Buildings in Steel'. 4

Fwd: US Dept OF Commerce : 911*Edward F. Haas, DR Morgan Reynolds, DRJudy Woods DOCS now on public record!

Please copy and save for your records.

FY 2007 Information Quality Request for Corrections

- Energy Loss by Buildings

- Fire Investigation Report on World Trade Center Bldgs 1 &
- Fire Investigation Report on World Trade Center Bldg
- Fire Investigation Report on World Trade Center

*Last Updated:* March 19, 2007

*FY 2007 Information Quality Request for Corrections*
US Department of Commerce:
Office of the Chief Information Officer

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

U.S. Navy Launches Show of Force Off Coast of Iran

News Updates from Citizens for Legitimate Government
27 March 2007
U.S. Navy Launches Show of Force Off Coast of Iran 27 Mar 2007 The U.S. Navy on Tuesday began its largest demonstration of force in the Persian Gulf since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, led by a pair of aircraft carriers and backed by warplanes flying simulated attack maneuvers off the coast of Iran. The maneuvers bring together two strike groups of U.S. warships and more than 100 U.S. warplanes to conduct simulated air warfare in the crowded Gulf shipping lanes.

Blair Warns of 'Different Phase' Over Britons in Iran 27 Mar 2007 U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair said that efforts to release 15 British sailors and Marines seized by Iran will enter a "different phase" if negotiations fail.

Please forward this update to anyone you think might be interested. Those who'd like to be added to the Newsletter list can sign up: Please write to: for inquiries.

CLG Newsletter editor: Lori Price, Manager. Copyright © 2007, Citizens For Legitimate Government ® All rights reserved. CLG Founder and Chair is Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D.

Fwd: Developments in the National Nine-Eleven Truth Grassroots Movement

Newsletter from -- 3/26/07

BREAKING NEWS! Kucinich Publicly Acknowledges Need for 9/11

"Kucinich brings hard-nosed arguments"

In an article published today at
"said that as chairman of a House subcommittee on domestic policy, he
plans to launch an investigation of 'a narrow portion' of the Sept.
11, 2001, terrorist attacks. He offered few details, but said his
subcommittee would be looking at 'a few, specific discrepancies in
the public record.' The 9/11 Commission that published its final
report in 2004 never resolved some conflicting facts, Kucinich said.
He announced his own look at 9/11 in answer to a question from an
audience member. The man complained that the 9/11 Commission was too
tied to the Bush administration to offer an unbiased report, and
Kucinich agreed."

We encourage readers to share this information with
your lists, and to contact Rep. Kucinich with a note of support at You might also wish to express gratitude
to this TimesUnion reporter, Dan Higgins, by e-mail at

Secondly, Rep. Kucinich is asking blog readers, "Impeachment:
I'm asking you. Do you think it's time?"

Please take a moment and reply to Rep. Kucinich's question at that
page... "Yes, and please include Articles of Impeachment for criminal
negligence and obstruction of justice arising from the crimes of
September 11th, 2001."


1. Fundraising Appeal
2. Planning for - sponsored conference in mid-August
3. Bob Bowman's US Tour
4. Mark Crispin Miller Promotes David Ray Griffin's New Book
5. Steering Committee/Advisory Board Update
6. Week-Long Corporate Shopping Boycott Set to Begin April15
7. Take Action/Calendar
8. Timely comparisons with Reagan's 1991 "October Surprise"

1. Spring Fundraiser Kicks Off

It is with a small amount of anxiety and a great deal of hope that
we announced our Spring 2007 Fundraiser. Many of you
have already received an email from us, but many may not have, due
to bulk mailing snafus and the like. If you have already donated
during this drive, we thank you very much. If you have not, please
consider contributing at this critically important time.

You probably know that gets by on a very small
administrative budget, yet there are so many things we want to do!
We need your support more than ever. Without it, many of the
projects we have planned for the year may be in jeopardy,
--National conference in August
--New National Poll
--Producing new, valuable materials for free distribution, like a
"Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story" DVD and pamphlet
--Sending representatives of to meet with
Congresspersons and Senators, and to represent the movement at
coalition events where our voice must be heard.
--Promotion and advertising of the 911 Truth message, demanding a
new, independent investigation of 9/11 and real justice for the
victims. For instance, as many of you have suggested, we'd like to
see 9/11 Truth billboards everywhere!

Our goal for this spring is $50,000, and every contribution - large
or small - helps and is genuinely appreciated. There are a number
of ways to support the efforts of You can become a
monthly sustainer ( )
for as little as $5/month, make a one-time donation, offer in-kind
donations or select premium items from our resource center (
) donations page. Please take a moment to make your donation now and
help us keep going strong!

2. Conference Being Planned for mid-August is in the early planning stages of a national
conference to be held in mid-August, with a location and theme to
be announced shortly. The conference will focus on the problems
with the way the major media report stories like 9/11, and discuss
strategies for re-taking, and re-making, the public airwaves. We'll
have a more thorough description of the conference along with dates
and location in our next newsletter.

3. Bowman Tour USA, Calling All Patriots

Dr. Bob Bowman, the retired USAF Lieutenant Colonel and recent
candidate for the US House of Representatives, has embarked on a
national tour to awaken the citizenry to the drift toward fascism
in the US and to call on people to unite in demanding a return to
constitutional rule.

"There is a Bible verse which says, 'There is no longer male nor
female, Jew nor Greek, slave nor free ...' I would like to
adapt that idea to our purpose. 'There is no longer Republican
nor Democrat, conservative nor liberal, hawk nor dove. There are
only we Patriots speaking truth to power and taking back our
country for the people.'"

Bowman's statement of purpose and link to the full tour schedule are
posted at:

4. Mark Crispin Miller Promotes David Ray Griffin's New Book (

The irrepressible and brilliant Mark Crispin Miller, a strong
supporter of 9/11 skepticism, has posted a summary on his blog of
David Ray Griffin's new book, "Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer
to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy

Griffin's book is not scheduled to be out until May, but you can
pre-order it from here (
). Speaking of Griffin, if you have not read his excellent essay on
the use of 9/11 as a pretext for imperial wars, and the place of
9/11 crimes in the impeachment debate, see this article (


5. Steering Committee/Advisory Board Change

Long-time steering committee member Gabriel Day has
moved from the steering committee to the advisory
board. We thank Gabriel for his tireless efforts on behalf of 9/11
truth, particularly surrounding last year's Chicago conference and
building a national network of 911truth activists, and look forward
to his continued involvement in this new role. For more info about
who's who at, our Mission Statement and Editorial
Policy, Achievements and Goals, please review the section linked
from About Us ( ) at
the main page. Please send emails specifically about outreach and
networking to outreach@...

6. Week-long National Corporate Shopping Boycott begins April 15

We hope you're preparing now for the April 15-22, Tax Day to Earth
Day, National Shopping Boycott ( )
when we're asked to avoid all corporate shopping and truly consider
where we're putting our money. The site includes some great
resources for learning some truth about corporations, banks,
contractors, and political money. Lew Brown, National Coordinator
of the boycott, explains: "By holding back on our spending, with
discipline and resolve and in sympathy for the millions who live in
misery because of this administration's policies, we not only show
our concern for the pain of others, we also put a little fear in
the hearts of those who have profited from this travesty." This is
a significant opportunity to take power into your own hands, as one
participant in a much larger, coordinated effort -- join in and Be
the Resistance!

7. Take Action!

Get involved! Many specific ideas for action are listed at our
article, "Now that you know, what can you do?" ( )
Join a local group - check out the list of local organizers at the
Grassroots Contacts page ( ). Nobody
in your area? Become the contact ( ) to form
your own local group.
And watch the 9/11 Calendar ( ) for events near you. Know of
an event that's not listed there? Post it, or forward that link to
the event organizer. It's open to everyone hosting 9/11-related
events. We are everywhere!

Steering Committee member Michael Berger has several interviews
coming up (one tonight!), in coordination with the national
Improbable Collapse Tour. Check the calendar for details, and
contact him at Mike@... to schedule a tour stop in your
area. For more details about the movie, "Improbable Collapse: The
Demolition of our Republic," a wealth of background information and
the movie trailer, check out ( )."

8. Timely Excerpt from Gary Sick's "October Surprise, America's
Hostages in Iran and the Election of Ronald Reagan" published by
Random House in 1991. Editor's Note:
Why don't more citizens accept the possibility that powerful people
within the halls of power are capable of "crimes that make the laws
tremble"? Here are some profound comments on the subject from former
National Security Council member Gary Sick. He was speaking about
the sociopolitical situation in the 1980s with respect to the
Iran-Contra scandal and the October Surprise, but he may just have
easily been talking about today's sociopolitical climate. If
anything, the climate today is more hostile to truth-telling.

From pages 226 - 228:

"We are accustomed to the petty scandals of Washington politics: A
candidate for high office is a lush or a compulsive womanizer; an
official lies to cover up an embarrassing policy failure. These are
misdeeds on a human scale, and those miscreants who are unfortunate
enough or careless enough to get caught are pilloried and punished
by the press and their peers in periodic cleansings. We regard such
rituals with a certain satisfaction, evidence of our democracy at

There is another category of offenses, described by the French poet
Andre Chenier as "les crimes puissants qui font trembler les lois,"
crimes so great that they make the laws themselves tremble. We know
what to do with someone caught misappropriating funds, but when
confronted with evidence of a systematic attempt to undermine the
political system itself, we recoil in a general failure of
imagination and nerve.

We understand the motives of a thief, even if we despise them. But
few of us have ever been exposed to the seductions of power on a
grand scale and we are unlikely to have given serious thought to
the rewards of political supremacy, much less to how it might be
achieved. We know that groups and individuals covet immense power
for personal or ideological reasons, but we suppose that those
ambitions usually will be pursued within the confines of the laws and
values of our society and democratic political system. If not, we
assume we will recognize the transgressions early enough to protect

Those who operate politically beyond the law, if they are deft and
determined, benefit from our often false sense of confidence. There
is a natural presumption, even among the politically sophisticated,
that "no one would do such a thing." Most observers are predisposed
toward disbelief, and therefore may be willing to disregard evidence
and to construct alternative explanations for events that seem too
distasteful to believe. This all-too-human propensity provides a
margin of safety for what would otherwise be regarded as immensely
risky undertakings.

Illegitimate political covert actions are attempts to alter the
disposition of power. Since all of politics involves organized
contention over the disposition of power, winners can be expected
to maintain that they were only playing the game, while those who
complain about their opponents' methods are likely to be dismissed
as sore losers. Even if suspicions arise, the charges are potentially
so grave that most individuals will be reluctant to give public
credence to allegations in the absence of irrefutable evidence. The
need to produce a "smoking gun" has become a precondition for
responsible reporting of political grand larceny. The participants
on political covert actions understand this and take pains to cover
their tracks, so the chance of turning up incontrovertible
Documentation of wrongdoing - such as the White House tapes in the
Watergate scandal - is slim.

This leads to a journalistic dilemma. In the absence of indisputable
evidence, the mainstream media - themselves large commercial
institutions with close ties to the political and economic
establishment - are hesitant to declare themselves on matters of
great political gravity. The so-called alternative media are less
reluctant, but they are too easily dismissed as irresponsible. By
the time the mainstream media are willing to lend their names and
reputations to a story of political covert action, the principal
elements of the story have almost always been reported long before
in the alternative media, where they were studiously ignored.

When the Iran-Contra scandal exploded in 1986, both Congress and the
media pulled up short. Neither had the stomach for the kind of
national trauma that would have resulted from articles of
impeachment being delivered against a popular President in who was
his last two years in office. So, when it could not be proven
conclusively that the President saw the "smoking gun" in the case -
a copy of a memo to Reagan reporting in matter-of-fact terms that
proceeds of Iranian arms sales were being diverted to the Nicaraguan
contras - the nation seemed to utter a collective sigh of relief.
(The original memo, bearing the signatures of those who had seen
it, had been deliberately destroyed.) The laws trembled at the
prospect of a political trial that could shatter the compact of
trust between rulers and ruled, a compact that was the foundation
upon which the laws themselves rested. The lesson seemed to be that
accountability declines as the magnitude of the offense and the power
of those charged increase.

The ultimate dilemma, which Chenier captured so perfectly in his
comment on the revolutionary politics of eighteenth-century France,
is the effect of very high stakes. A run-of-the-mill political
scandal can safely be exposed without affecting anyone other than
the culprits and their immediate circle. A covert political coup,
however, like the one engineered by Casey in 1980, challenges the
legitimacy of the political order; it deliberately exploits
weaknesses in the political immune system and risks infecting the
entire organism of state and society."


As always, we thank you all for your continuing, powerful efforts
and support of the organization and our collective efforts.

The Steering Committee

Janice Matthews, Executive Director, 816-277-9375, Kansas City, MO,

Mike Berger, Media Coordinator, 314-308-4893, St. Louis, MO,

David Kubiak, International Campaign Advisor, 207-332-3071, San
Francisco, CA, david@...

Erik Larson, Volunteer Coordinator, Los Angeles, CA,

Michael Richardson, Webmaster & Contributing Editor,

Bryan Sacks, Research/Editor, 267-228-0136, Philadelphia, PA,

Michael Wolsey, Rocky Mountain Program Coordinator, 970-576-6431,
Greeley, CO, michael@...

Administrative calls, tips, ideas and emails: 800.985.1183,


Please forward this email to your lists. To subscribe to our free
email newsletter, please visit email sign up ( )

You have received this email because you signed up to receive the Newsletter and/or you signed the
petition. Please be aware that we value your privacy and will NEVER
provide any of your information to anyone. EVER! If you ever wish to
be removed from our email list, please click the "Unsubscribe" link

[Fwd: Read, Forward, Act, Donate Today]

Donate online to support World Cant Waits efforts for immediate impeachment of Bush & Cheney.

You can choose to make a tax-deductible donation of $100 or more to support the educational activities of World Can't Wait if you make your check payable to "Alliance for Global Justice". Be sure to specify it is "for WCW" in the memo on the check. (Checks previously made out to World Can't Wait/AGJ were also acceptable.) Mail to: World Can't Wait, 305 W. Broadway #185, New York, NY 10013.

READ about the bus ride to the Pentagon in "Talk of the Town" in The New Yorker this week.

To the World Cant Wait Community,

Friday, Congress voted to expand funding for the war in Iraq, after Pelosi and the Democratic leaders refused to even consider a bill to remove the troops from Iraq immediately, and fund only their removal. They say this is an "anti-war" measure. Next, the Senate will pass its own re-funding of the war, and even then, Bush says he will veto any bill that sets any kind of date for pulling troops out of Iraq.

In response, Sean Penn, Daniel Ellsberg spoke strongly for impeachment Saturday. Rocky Anderson, the mayor of Salt Lake City has been featured on national news media (NPR today and the NY Times last week) as an advocate of impeachment.

In this newsletter are views weve gathered on what just happened. But wed like to know what you think. What do people at your work and school think? Write me.

Howard Zinn on the re-funding of the war in the appropriations bill:
"To me it is tantamount to the abolitionists accepting a two-year timeline for ending slavery, while giving more money to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act".

"Democrat's Victory Means More Iraqi Deaths: End the War Now -- Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!" by Sunsara Taylor

You Voted Them In to End the War, They Just Voted to Keep Funding It

March 23, 2007: Democrats in the House vote to continue funding the war, handing Bush $100 billion. Within the funding bill is a withdrawal timetable resolution to pull most troops out of Iraq by September 1st, 2008, and insists that the benchmarks for progress in Iraq be made requirements. The Democratic Party leadership touts this bill as a new direction in Iraq. Dont believe the hype

To the extent that the Democratic Party leadership opposes Bushs war, it is from the standpoint of defending and extending empire. They are deeply concerned about the ongoing debacle in Iraq and how it might hurt "American interests" (translation: empire), but not about the war crimes being committed by the US military. And while mouthing supposed opposition to the Iraq war, they call for strengthening the war on Afghanistan in the name of the "war on terrorism". (See Escalation of War on Afghanistan: What Will be the Consequences for the People? and The "Good War" in Afghanistan on for more on why the war on Afghanistan is unjust.) And in the bill passed Friday, language requiring Bush to get Congressional approval before attacking Iran was taken out at the insistence of Democratic Party leadership (see Congressional Democrats Strip Language Limiting Attack Against Iran From Bill).

If all that isnt enough for you, then keep in mind there is no enforcement mechanism for troop withdrawal by September 1 st, 2008 in this bill, and Bush has threatened to veto the legislation anyway.

This war must be stopped. War on Iran must be prevented. And Bush must be impeached.
But this isnt going to come from the Democrats in Congress. Its going to have to come from political upheaval from below, from the millions of people who hate this war getting out in the streets and demanding this war end nowread more

Some must reads on Versus Its Members by David Swanson Support the Troops? Or End the War Now? Q&A: If we pull out of Iraq, won't it get worse? Who's to Blame for the Civil War in Iraq?
Debra Sweet
Director, The World Cant Wait Drive Out the Bush Regime

World Can't Wait
305 W. Broadway #185
New York, NY 10013


Dear Friend of the American Constitution:

I just called on congressional leaders to demand that Attorney
General Alberto Gonzales resign or be removed from office. The recent
scandals involving the dismissals of eight U.S. Attorneys and the
report that the F.B.I., which is part of the Department of Justice,
violated the law and abused its authority under the Patriot Act to
obtain personal information about American citizens are just the most
recent in a series of failures.

This Attorney General puts the President above the people. He has
shown a deeper fidelity to the political interests of President Bush
than to the public interest and the rule of law. It is in the
nation's best interest for the Attorney General to resign, and if he
fails to do so, President Bush should remove him from office.

The New York Times recently called for removing Gonzales from
office. Can you join me - and a growing chorus of voices - by
speaking out and signing the emergency petition that Congress demand
Gonzales resign or be removed from office?

Click here to sign the petition:

Thanks for your help,
[your name]

Marie Buchanan, M.Ps.
Researcher, Pastor-Assistant, Translator


Embattled AG now accused in teen sex scandal 'cover-up'Attorney General Gonzales among officials who allegedly ignored abuse of minor boys

Read More

Monday, March 26, 2007

Breaking: Gonzales aide to invoke Fifth Amendment

News Update from Citizens for Legitimate Government
26 March 2007
Breaking: Gonzales aide to invoke Fifth Amendment --Goodling will refuse to answer Senate questions on fired U.S. attorneys 26 Mar 2007 Monica Goodling, a Justice Department official involved in the firings of federal prosecutors, will refuse to answer questions at upcoming Senate hearings, citing Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, her lawyer said Monday.

Please forward this update to anyone you think might be interested. Those who'd like to be added to the Newsletter list can sign up: Please write to: for inquiries.

CLG Newsletter editor: Lori Price, Manager. Copyright © 2007, Citizens For Legitimate Government ® All rights reserved. CLG Founder and Chair is Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D.

PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH Press Release





Contact: Robert Balsamo
e-mail: pilots@...

Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an international organization of pilots and
aviation professionals, petitioned the National Transportation and
Safety Board (NTSB) via the Freedom of Information Act to obtain
their 2002 report, "Flight Path Study-American Airlines Flight 77",
consisting of a Comma Separated Value (CSV) file and Flight Path
Animation, allegedly derived from Flight 77's Flight Data Recorder

The data provided by the NTSB contradict the 9/11 Commission Report
in several significant ways:

The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not
support official events.
All Altitude data shows the aircraft at least 300 feet too high to
have struck the light poles.
The rate of descent data is in direct conflict with the aircraft
being able to impact the light poles and be captured in the Dept of
Defense "5 Frames" video of an object traveling nearly parallel with
the Pentagon lawn.
The record of data stops at least one second prior to official impact
If data trends are continued, the aircraft altitude would have been
at least 100 feet too high to have hit the Pentagon.
In August, 2006, members of Pilots for 9/11 Truth received these
documents from the NTSB and began a close analysis of the data they
contain. After expert review and cross check, Pilots for 9/11 Truth
has concluded that the information in these NTSB documents does not
support, and in some instances factually contradicts, the official
government position that American Airlines Flight 77 struck the
Pentagon on the morning of September 11, 2001.

According to the 9/11 Commission Report, which relied heavily upon
the NTSB Flight Path Study, American Airlines Flight 77 struck the
Pentagon at 9:37:46 AM on the morning of September 11, 2001.
However, the reported impact time according to the NTSB Flight Path
Study is 09:37:45. Also according to reports, American Airlines
Flight 77 struck the Pentagon and by doing so, struck down 5 light
poles on Highway 27 in its path to the west wall.

The information provided by the NTSB does not support the 9/11
Commission Report of American Airlines Flight 77 impact with the

Pilots for 9/11 Truth is committed to discovering the truth
surrounding the events of September 11, 2001. We have contacted both
the NTSB and the FBI regarding these and other inconsistencies. To
date, they have refused to comment on, correct, refute, retract or
offer side-letters that might explain the discrepancies between what
they claim are the data extracted from the FDR of AA Flight 77 and
the official story alleging its crash into the Pentagon.

As concerned citizens and professionals in the aviation industry,
Pilots for 9/11 Truth asks, why have these discrepancies not been
addressed by agencies within the United States Government? Why have
they falsely represented their own data to the American people?
Pilots for 9/11 Truth takes the position that an official government
inquiry into these discrepancies is warranted and long overdue. We
call upon our fellow citizens to write to their Congressional
representatives to inform them of these discrepancies and call for an
immediate investigation into this matter. For more information please


Robert Balsamo
4000+ Total Flight Time
Independence Air/Atlantic Coast Airlines

Glen Stanish
15,000+ Total Flight Time
American Airlines, ATA, TWA, Continental

Captain Russ Wittenberg (ret)
30,000+ Total Flight Time
Former Pan Am, United
United States Air Force (ret)
Over 100 Combat Missions Flown

John Lear
Son of Bill Lear
Founder, creator of the Lear Jet Corporation
More than 40 years of Flying
19,000+ Total Flight Time

Captain Jeff Latas
USAF (ret)
Captain - JetBlue Airways

Ted Muga
Naval Aviator - Retired Commander, USNR

Col Robert Bowman USAF (ret)
Directed all the ?Star Wars? programs under Presidents Ford and
Carter - 101 combat missions

Alfons Olszewski
Founder Veterans For Truth
US Army (ret)
Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief

Robin Hordon
Former Boston Center Controller
Commercial Pilot

John Panarelli
Friend and fellow aviator of John Ogonowski - Capt. AA #11
11,000+ Total Flight Time
Eastern Metro, Braniff, Ryan International, Emery
Worldwide, Polar Air Cargo

Lt. Colonel Shelton F. Lankford
United States Marine Corps (ret)
10,000+ Total Flight Time
303 Combat Missions

Captain Dan Govatos
10,000+ Total Flight Time
Former Chief Pilot of Casino Express airlines
Director of Operations Training at Polar Air

George Nelson
Colonel USAF (Ret.)
Licensed Commercial Pilot and Aircraft Mechanic

Dennis Spear
Army Aviator (ret)
7000+ Total Flight Time Operations Officer, Aviation Safety Officer

Captain Joe H. Ferguson
30,000+ Total Flight Time (ret) USAF (ret)

For complete member list please visit

ENCLOSURE: Cover letter of FOIA requests.

Fwd: Combatant Status Review Tribunals

Good site, and free pod cast:
Combatant Status Review Tribunals

Co-hosts Michael Ratner and Dalia Hashad discuss the legal efficacy of
these tribunals for Guantanamo Bay detainees. From the Amnesty
International USA site - "In the "war on terror", detainees in US
custody have been treated as potential sources of information first and
criminal suspects a distant second. However, this secondary aspect is
now coming into focus. Plucked from years of secret or virtually
incommunicado detention, a few people held in the US Naval Base at
Guantánamo Bay in Cuba are facing trial by military commission."
Combatant Status Review Tribunals proceedings:

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Top News- 9-11 Remains Possibly Used to Pave Roads - AOL News

another sick example of our perps trying their best to
make it known how sick, perverted and foul they are. amen.
*(this was sent out by citizens for legitimate government)

"Why the Facts of 9/11 Must Be Suppressed: Understanding the Ruling

"Why the Facts of 9/11 Must Be Suppressed: Understanding the Ruling
Group Mind Behind the War Without End"*

With Dr. John McMurtry, Professor of Philosophy at the University of
Guelph, Ontario in a presentation at the International Citizens
Into 9/11 on May 30, 2004 in Toronto. McMurtry was one of the first
academics to analyze 9/11 and the 9/11 wars. In response to the
pressure of forcing reality to conform to manufactured delusions, the
group and its members become increasingly submerged within a
pre-conscious field of hysteria, denials and projections. Their
is being played out in Iraq against heroic resistance, while elsewhere
in the empire the "regulating group mind" demands complicity with its
fundamental assumption - that 9/11 was an attack from the outside.

thought others may be interested that were not awake to the 911 hoax
in 2004